Actually I found a couple of other past threads with
similar issue:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-user&m=109108873418937&w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-user&m=109224171621865&w=2

Is there any open bug on this?

Thanks,
Shantanu Sen

--- Shantanu Sen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I have an interface that I export to a WSDL using
> Axis
> 1.2 RC1. The WSDL has the following namespace
> declared
> 
> xmlns:tns5="http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema";
> 
> and a complextype specified using this namespace as
> shown below:
> 
>  <complexType name="MyBaseBean">
>  <sequence/>
>  <complexType name="MyBean">
>     <complexContent>
>      <extension base="impl:MyBaseBean">
>       <sequence>
>        <element name="value" nillable="true"
> type="tns5:anyType"/>
>       </sequence>
>      </extension>
>     </complexContent>
>    </complexType>
> 
> I think the issue is that the types section has
> http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema as the default
> namespace, but the anytype uses the tns5 namespace.
> Here is the beginning of the types section:
> 
> <wsdl:types>
>   <schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
> targetNamespace="http://service.mycompany.com";>
> ....
> 
> When I try to run dotnet wsdl.exe on this, dotnet
> produces the following error:
> 
> -----
> Microsoft (R) Web Services Description Language
> Utility
> [Microsoft (R) .NET Framework, Version 1.1.4322.573]
> Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 1998-2002. All
> rights reserved.
> 
> Schema validation warning: Namespace
> 'http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema' is not a
> vailable to be referenced in this schema.
> Schema validation warning: Type
> 'http://www.w3.org/1999/XMLSchema:anyType' is not
> declared.
> 
> Warning: Schema could not be validated. Class
> generation may fail or may produce
>  incorrect results.
> 
> Error: Unable to import binding 'SoapBinding' from
> namespace ....
> -------
> 
> Changing the tns5 namespace to 2001 fixes this.
> 
> Anyone seen this before. Any ideas why the anyType
> is
> generated with 1999 namespace?
> 
> Thanks,
> Shantanu Sen
> 
> 

Reply via email to