As you may have noted, apachesoap namspace is probably an alias, because in the attachment example, it's tns1. However, the important line maybe this:
<import namespace="http://xml.apache.org/xml-soap"/>
in the WSDL file. So, same question, is this namespace standard for use with attachment, or should I import a different namespace for attachment for it to be standard?
Thanks,
vh
V D wrote:
When generating a wsdl from java with attachment (DataHandler), I see this:
<wsdl:part name="in0" type="apachesoap:DataHandler"/>
in the message declaration.
Is this "apachesoap" namespace not following standard? What is the standard way of doing this? Would this WSDL be a problem if running under other library/platform than Axis?
Thanks,
Vh.