That only makes sense, 'wrapped' is more of an Axis thing. Jai -----Original Message----- From: jay limfueco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 2:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Serialization Compatibility
hmmm.... that's weird I seem to be having a problem in .Net interoperability when using 'wrapped/literal' but works fine on 'document/literal' and 'RPC/encoded' some XML Validation errors when parsing the apache generated WSDL. On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:56:30 +0100, WAJSBERG Julien RD-BIZZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I found once that interoperability for HashMap of Strings is good > between axis 1.1 and Perl, using RPC/Encoded. > > using literal encoding, it doesn't work anymore. > > The problem is that you will need wrapped/literal mode for > interoperability with .Net :) > > So, Anne is right, you should avoid HashMap and Collections in general. > > jay limfueco a écrit : > > >Hi, > > > >I'm currently working on a web service that should support PHP, Pearl > >and .Net clients and I was wondering if a serialized HashMap is > >supported by those other languages. > > > >Thanks > > > > > > > >
