On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Kip Hampton wrote: > Robin Berjon wrote: > > > > > > They don't care about being compatible with us. In fact, just because > > it's suggested by one of us and not one of them they'll reject it as > > "dirty". I'd say don't bother wasting your patience on them. > > You may be right, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't try. If they're > wrong for being dismissive and unilateral then we'd be wrong to follow suit. > > I'm +1 on the ATV in XSP, but we really should give our fellow ASFians > the benefit of the doubt and discuss it in public. The XSP "spec" was > theirs originally, after all...
A good voice of reason. I've now posted to both xsp-dev and cocoon-dev. I got one enthusiastic private response from the xsp-dev posting. Nothing so far (and I don't expect to given prior response rates) on cocoon-dev. -- <!-- Matt --> <:->get a SMart net</:-> Spam trap - do not mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
