--- Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 22 Apr 2004, at 21:18, Mike Chamberlain wrote: > > > Well the config reader would obviously have to > support the option in > > the same way it supports > > other Ax* directives... > > What I meant was, would a different pipeline model > require a completely > different looking config file, and thus be tied to a > configreader. >
Ah, I see what you mean. OK, at the moment I've only required the one extra directive, but then I've not tried to do anything clever with it. I'm guessing there is no easy way which would allow modules to define their own configuration options, and some how extend the config reader when they're used. That would be really cool, but require quite a bit of thought into that api. Mike.
