Matt Sergeant wrote:
My suggestion is that to move forwards with things we hold off on the TLP thing for now - lets get the other parts of Kip's proposal working first. Lets try and eat this sandwich a bite at a time.
Any objections/comments?
Part of the point of the TLP proposal was to snap people out of a sense of inertia that has persisted for months-- to draw a clear line in time that says "that was then, but this is now, and let's get on with the new thing". Trying to pick-and-choose and pull things from that proposal in piecemeal not only takes away that "fresh start", it is, IMO, a recipe for more confusion. "New wine in old skins", as the saying goes.
If you have specific concerns anout the proposal, bring them up. If not, I don't see any value whatsoever in waiting around and/or settling for half-measures.
-kip
