On Tue, 8 Jan 2002, Robin Berjon wrote: > On Monday 07 January 2002 21:08, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > On 7 Jan 2002, Steve Willer wrote: > > > In the spirit of "release early and often", I would definitely say put > > > the site live ASAP, put the code up there ASAP, and make the move > > > announcement (coupled with a release 1.5 announcement, perhaps). > > > > > > Then maybe do the larger changes afterwards. With another announcement! > > > > I think that's probably wise. We'll see if anyone has a conflicting > > viewpoint. > > +1 (hey, it's asf now ;) > > > What about the web site though? Redirect to axkit.org, or convert the site > > to html/xml and upload, or create a new site from scratch? > > I'd say redirect to axkit.org for now, and *never*ever* switch to using their > dreadful publishing system. It simply is awful. > > I think that the best thing would be to have a look and feel that more or > less matches theirs but has a personal touch (unless someone feels like being > truly creative). However we ought to keep our own prepublishing system (based > on xlstproc I guess) because what they use is simply awful. I just tested it > a few minutes ago and it simply is broken.
Well if we keep the web site, but use their style and provide links back to xml.apache.org, we can use AxKit for delivery. I think that's probably the best overall way to go. So I need a volunteer to convert the current site to XSLT using the apache.org style. -- <!-- Matt --> <:->Get a smart net</:-> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
