On Thursday 14 March 2002 13:11, Matt Sergeant wrote: > We've been thinking of releasing 1.5.1 for some time now, but a few things > have held us back. Number one was XML::LibXML 1.40 waiting in the wings, > which is now out. Number two is the demo site. Progress is slow on that, > since I'm the only one contributing to it at the moment. You can eye my > progress at http://axkit.org/axkit/. > > The question is should we just release anyway without the demo site, or > should we put in what we have?
I haven't looked at the source yet, but if there are as many 403s, 501s, and XSP exceptions, then we probably shouldn't include the demo site :-) If they're not normal and the demo site is simply incomplete we should ship it (perhaps with a note saying that it's work in progress, and does not represent the entirety of what can be done with AxKit). In any case I am all in favour of releasing more often, as it gives the impression of an active project. It's also easier (ie less dangerous) for people to upgrade when there haven't been a gazillion changes, and allows for earlier porpogration of fixes (which helps when you see the number of people on #axkit that I've pointed to CVS to fix their problems). Should we move the axkit-docs project to the same CVS server? It maybe that having both projects together would help a bit :) -- _______________________________________________________________________ Robin Berjon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- CTO k n o w s c a p e : // venture knowledge agency www.knowscape.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Heisenberg may have been here. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
