-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 20 May 2002 7:11 pm, Steve Willer wrote: > On Mon, 20 May 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > So overall the question becomes do we change passthru, or do we add some > > new passthru-like operator? I'd prefer to fix passthru, as I hate to add > > extra cruft, but I'm open to other thoughts on this (including ones that > > say "Do nothing - it ain't broke don't fix it"). > > In another system, I've implemented an operator that works kinda like a > "runto" value. Each rule in the pipeline definition has a numeric > ID, and when the runto is set, it will execute the pipeline up to that > point. > > For example, if you have a pipeline: > > 100 openoffice->xml conversion > 200 transform via per-page xsl > 201 transform via root xsl > 300 postprocessing > > and you use "runto=100" in the URL, it will show you the XML after the > OpenOffice conversion. You could hold on to the existing passthru to show > the original openoffice file (or you could use "runto=0" instead, > conceivably).
How do you determine the ID values? - -- <:->get a SMart net</:-> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE86Xk0VBc71ct6OywRAqVJAKC7snrY+fDW2tAmGUbYtPmvFECsKwCcDi/F eZByXMyNjz6efALDC8G1Ahg= =Yrmd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
