On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 16:26, Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 04:15:45PM -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote: > > We're not flushing the caches at all. I did modify AxKit to store > > everything in multiple subdirectories (based on the key...so > > 09e301ca411f508c7e1ffe349de2cc2f would be stored in axkit/09/e3), so I > > avoided the "very large directory lookup" problems we had. > > > > Of course, the cache is 80546 files totalling 850M...which is a little > > unwieldy :) > > it doesnt seem like it would take much to have this spiral > up out of control? maybe you dont tinker with the stylesheets every > day like I do :-}
Well, this is our production machine, so we don't do much tinkering on it. We've got somewhere between 36-39,000 'virtual' pages (due to selecting sections with path info, etc) on the site, so its really only about 2x. Since we allow users to log in (and that changes their extra-info that axkit uses to determine the cache key), it could theoretically grow forever. Since we bought a ton of disk space, numbers like these please the bean counters :) On our development machine, it levels off, since we have a fixed size staff. The cache files should be replacing their older versions when the stylesheet changes, right? Brian > -- > Sebastian Rahtz OUCS Information Manager > 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
