> Would people like to outline their AxKit cache-housekeeping > mechanisms? We started off with a simple reaper which > zapped files which had not been accessed for a week, but this > seems to break AxKit. I assume this is because a call for foo.bar.baz > generates XXXX and XXXX.gz, which may get accessed at > different times. > But then AxKit seems to assume XXXX.gz exists if XXXX does. > > I assume that a) people *are* using caches, and b) are not > simply flushing them by hand?
At upmystreet we have all axkit caching turned off. Due to us having 1.6 million variations of every page. We do some neat caching of sql queries instead. Can't say we've found the libxslt to be much of a bottleneck. Mike. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
