On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 14:32, Wendell wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:57:05AM -0500, Brian Wheeler wrote: > > On Wed, 2002-01-09 at 09:35, Robin Berjon wrote: > > > On Wednesday 09 January 2002 15:24, Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:22:22PM +0100, Robin Berjon wrote: > > > > > On Tuesday 08 January 2002 22:38, Brian Wheeler wrote: > > > > > > Our site isn't showing up on various search engines (google, alta > > > > > > vista) properly. Is anyone else seeing this on axkit-driven sites? > > > > > > We're running axkit 1.4. > > > > > > > > > > Pretty much all of our sites that are running axkit show up in Google, > > > > > with proper descriptions and all. > > > > > > > > As one would expectl; how can Google possibly know its an axkit site? > > > > the result is, after all, just HTML..... > > > > > > Yes but there have been cases of dynamic generation systems or publishing > > > systems that caused search engines to run away (or downgrade the content). I > > > think this is what Brian was concerned with. > > > > > > > *sniff* I just want it to work :) > > > > Seriously, though, the search > > > > site:icpac.indiana.edu xml > > > > on google returns hits, but no summaries or titles...but not nearly all > > the pages on our site (somewhere near 39,000) > > Could it be your /robots.txt? > > Wendell
F*ck. Somebody whap me with a clue-by-four. I put a robots.txt into cvs for our site so people wouldn't index the development copies, but forgot to drop it from the production site. Thanks for the reminder, I'm an idiot. Brian --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
