On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 02:56:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > the xml files will come dynamically out from some middleware > then I have XSLT stylesheets which transfrom the XML files > into html. > the performance bottleneck of this is the XSLT transformation.
Why not try it and see? I don't notice it at all. > one idea is to write an apache module which handles the transformation in C. > this is obviously very fast, but also very ugly to write and to maintain. that depends on how complex the transformation is > it should also be possible to write XSTL extensions. to do what? > can this be done also with axkit?? yes, which would call XSLT (or XPathScript) > how fast do you think would be an axkit solution compared to the apache > xslt module (using libxslt from xmlsoft.org)? indistinguishable, I'd guess. thats what axkit does > axkit seems to be great and I really would like to know if this is an > option here. but I am sure that some will argue due to the fact that some > of axkit is written in perl, it will be very slow. > so I need some arguments against this. it could be less good than the fastest solution money could buy. but its certainly not dog slow in any sense. why not suck it and see? -- Sebastian Rahtz OUCS Information Manager 13 Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 6NN. Phone +44 1865 283431 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
