On Wednesday 20 February 2002 12:19, Matt Sergeant wrote: > On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > > Matt Sergeant said at 16:28 20-2-2002: > > >For Steve, the answer is that libgdome features intelligent garbage > > >collection. At the moment for XML::LibXML we've had to hack on a form of > > >garbage collection wrapped around Perl's GC features, but it's about as > > >stable as a Callista Flockhart in a force 10 gale. Ultimately the > > >intention is to re-write XML::LibXML to work around this, but that's > > > going to take time, and almost not worth it when XML::GDOME has done it > > > already. > > > > I trust the transition for XML::LibXSLT users is as transparent as > > Callista Flockhart standing before a bright light? :-) > > It should be pretty transparent. In AxKit terms we may enable perfect > transparency by just using whichever we detect is installed (preferring > XML::GDOME).
I would guess it would be transparent for AxKit, since the move from Sablotron to LibXML was, and its no bigger change than that. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
