>>>>> On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 10:03:54 -0500, Barrie Slaymaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> nod. On the other hand, I think that for the scales of load you're > talking about, mod_perl should not even be invoked and a font end > "reverse" or "invisible" caching server should probably be used. Even > with AxKit's more efficient-than-mod_perl start up implementation, > getting in and out of the perl interpreter is not as fast as we would > all like it to be. Eeek, I wasn't aware of that! You make me even more curious. > There is a middle ground, of course, and it would be nice if AxKit > had cache timeout controls for dynamic pages. I agree with you about > caching logic and cache interval granularities. Great. > Can I forward a copy of this message to axkit-users for further > discussion? Please do, I just subscribed myself so I'll follow the discussion, but I'm teaching the next week, so probably won't be able to participate. Thanks & Regards, -- andreas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
