-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 13 April 2002 5:17 pm, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
> In the last exciting episode of Das Internet,Matt Sergeant spewed forth the
> following FUD:
^^^
Excuse me?
> > On Saturday 13 April 2002 1:39 am, Chris Wenham wrote:
> >> AddType application/x-xsp .xsp
> >
> > That should be application/xsp+xml probably (which is how other xml
> > sub-types are defined).
>
> Well, now I'm really confused.
> As most people probably did, I started to learn AxKit from the axkit.org
> site, and a perl.com article on using AxKit.
>
> http://www.axkit.org/docs/guide.dkb?section=7
> http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2002/03/12/axkit.html?page=2
>
> ..both use application/x-xsp , which is where I picked up the content-type
> from...
>
> Is there a 'right' answer to this?
AxKit 1.5.1 changed how it detected XML. It dropped the sniffer that looked
inside of XML files for the <?xml section. This meant that the check for
whether we should process something relied solely on a few simple things,
like the filename, the content-type, and so on. However that check occurs if
and only if using the slower PerlHandler AxKit method, rather than the
"AddHandler axkit .xsp" method (for obvious reasons).
So the right answer is to use AddHandler.
As far as the actual mime type used, we do generally use application/x-xsp,
but it's not really set in stone. We only test for "xml" in the mime type in
the test above, so if you use application/xsp+xml, it should work.
Hope that helps.
- --
<:->get a SMart net</:->
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjy4vnYACgkQVBc71ct6OyxgsQCgp0MqsCnQudzt8kdeJGEAUvDD
i2wAoKSj0RSUCk/CPn3af+cArdzV7boB
=MhUJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
