On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, J�rg Walter wrote: > On Sunday, 30. June 2002 12:11, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > > Now that exception as_xml generation is done in the right place (in the > > Exception class), we can, or could, work on getting extra information into > > the exception. For example, with compilation errors we could put the source > > code into the XML. > > Is it really that useful? I find myself having errors in some eval not > locatable in a file. The idea, though, is cool.
I think it could be useful to have some extra context. For example the IO errors could include the filename as a separate part of the XML, allowing for much better error styling (and allowing for removing filename info if you're worried about that revealing something about a site). -- <!-- Matt --> <:->Get a smart net</:-> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
