Tod Harter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I didn't dig into it TOO much, but even the basic box model that lets you > display stuff using CSS2 as if it is a table is too broken for realistic > everyday use in the real world. That may well be because too many people have > somewhat older versions of browsers etc, but that seems to be > the case.
Wired Magazine recently went with an all-CSS/XHTML layout (http://www.wired.com/news/explanation.html). I tried it on Netscape 4.8 as well as 3-something. It worked on 4 -- not all the styling was there, but so what. 3 had some sort of javascript problem. It also worked worked perfectly in IE6. Which doesn't really contradict what you are saying (except the part about "too broken for everyday use"). Wired's audience is somewhat more gee-whiz enabled. Many sites probably wouldn't be comfortable losing any styling. But, even then, less is more for most people. See Google and the recent Altavista redesign. Mark. -- You are a mystery as deep as the sea; the more I search, the more I find, and the more I find the more I search for you. -- St. Catherine of Siena --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
