-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

=?iso-8859-1?q?J=F6rg=20Walter?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> That's what Matt meant: XSLT works differently. There is no Perl whatsoever 
> involved with XSLT. But don't be fooled by the Syntax. XSLT is 
> turing-complete, and using EXSLT-Functions (see www.exslt.org) you have most 
> of the stuff you need and can do quite complex things. Not that you need to, 
> since often you just don't need to go programming with XSLT.

OK. Transforming sections from docbook structures should be ok then.

> Taglibs belong to XSP and have nothing to do with XSLT. XSP doesn't compare 
> well to XPathScript or XSLT since it works more like HTML::Mason or
> PHP.

Including document titles from other documents, remote or local,
or reading from a database should then be prepared in an xsp
processing stage, right? 

And performance? Still better than with on XPathScript Stylesheet
doing "all in one"?

Markus

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.6 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>

iD8DBQE9/em5xxUzQSse11ARAm4IAJ47+dNu7df7IJUGioH2uWZh72OTugCffFFo
ZOXQL5CnRRgCusiHnpCRXMw=
=3UjT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to