OK, there's lots of posts flying about, so I think it's worth clearing
this up into one place under a new thread.
For a start, let me say emphatically that XPathScript isn't going away
- for anyone using it right now it will still be there in AxKit in the
future.
As far as downplaying XPathScript, well if that's how the community
wants to play things then we can follow that notion. But it's a
documentation issue, and as such it's going to require VOLUNTEERS. This
is a free software project and our time is limited (I do this only when
my wife isn't looking ;-), and documentation is always the last thing
to get written or fixed. Seriously though - I have put an enormous
amount of work into this project as have other developers, and we don't
get much back from it...
So if you want to help fix the docs the worst thing you can do for this
project is to moan about it to us. The axkit core developers want to
hear these things in order of preference:
1. "I want to help out any way I can, what can I do?"
2. "Here's a patch"
3. "Everything works great, thanks!"
4. "Here's a bug report" (on http://rt.cpan.org/, thanks)
I hope this gets the message across ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [ANNOUNCE] DocBook2LaTeX v. 1.0.0 Matt Sergeant
- [ANNOUNCE] DocBook2LaTeX v. 1.0.0 dom
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] DocBook2LaTeX v. 1.0.0 Robin Berjon
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] DocBook2LaTeX v. 1.0.0 dom
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] DocBook2LaTeX v. 1.0.0 Sebastian Rahtz
- Re: [ANNOUNCE] DocBook2LaTeX v. 1.0.0 Robin Berjon
- xps pro and con argument Sebastian Rahtz
- Re: xps pro and con argument Robin Berjon
- AW: xps pro and con argument Murat �nalan
- Re: xps pro and con argument Marco Marongiu
