Desperately trying to scratch the itch here... ;-)
:-)
Below is a diff against latest CVS that, at least in my simple testcase, fixes the problem with the ordering of AxAddDynamicProcessor in the pipeline. But like I said before, I'm not a C guy (mostly hunt-peck-copy-paste on my part), and I may have overlooked something, so could someone please review this diff and make sure it's acceptable.
Looks good, and, best of all, it works! Thanks, Jason :-)
Before I check it in, though, I want to make sure we're not killing folks that were depending on the previous "DynamicProcessors are always appended" behavior. Mind you, I'm not suggesting that we revert back to that, but I can imagine cases where people might have used that as a quick and dirty way to always set the last style in the processing chain. Anyone? Brian, will the change still allow you to do what you need? If no one screams, I'll check Jason's patch in on Monday.
-kip
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
