On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 09:41, Robin Berjon wrote:
> Is it possible that /usr/local/* aren't in your include and lib paths?
Nope. I regularly compile stuff which uses GNU libs and utils all
of which are under /usr/local/{bin|include|lib}.
> > I did some googling and found an index to the mail archives, but
> > the only mention of iconv refers to Text::Iconv which looks like
> > it's a Perl library, and it doesn't appear to be anything to do with
> > AxKit failing to see GNU iconv and libiconv.
>
> Text::Iconv and AxKit bind to iconv the same way so it's the same thing.
But that doesn't help making AxKit's Makefile.PL recognise iconv.
> > The error seems to be in Apache/AxKit/Makefile.PL, where it says
> > if (have_library("iconv", "iconv") || have_library("iconv", "libiconv"))
> > {
> > and have_library is define in the top-level Makefile.PL, but my
> > Perl isn't up to working out where it's looking...obviously not
> > in /usr/lib, /usr/local/lib, /usr/include, or /usr/local/include.
>
> One option is to comment out that check and see if it works. Some systems have
> very stupid bugs that prevent it from working.
I wanted to try this but my Perl isn't up to it.
> > Has anyone managed to get AxKit installed on a Red Hat system?
>
> Yes, many people :)
Cool, so it's worth pursuing. OK, second question, has anyone ever
managed to get AxKit installed on Red Hat 9, and if so, how did they#
overcome this problem?
///Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
