-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On July 8, 2004 01:54 pm, John Russell wrote: > Is there a reason for the choice of PassiveTex over FOP for > rendering FO in AxKit?
I wondered this myself, but after I had a hard time getting PassiveTex to do what I wanted, the reason became less important than "how do I get my document to render properly?" Consequently, I blatantly ripped off the PassiveTex Apache module and made AxKit::Language::Language::FOP. If anyone else would like it, I could release it as a CPAN module. For the time being however, you can get it at http://cvs.nachbaur.com/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/Apache-AxKit-Language-FOP/ - -- Michael A. Nachbaur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://nachbaur.com/pgpkey.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA7sImvow0fXaFDZQRAl/vAJ9z2Tiw3XkDTlVBui0FZOE3TJ7yxACfZ/K2 uamE0UDB3VOF/om9EFaMMQY= =QnDj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
