-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Marco Marongiu wrote:
| ...did anybody find any time to look into the issue I described? The
| time is running out for me and if I can't find an AxKit solution I'll
| have to switch to something different :-(
I had a look at it and it took a few minutes to create a quick-fix.
Hence, the patch available at
http://pepl.info/scratch/perform-1.84and_checkbox_simpleselect_patches_against1.83.patch
only helps with checkboxes and simple_selects, I did not have time to
test for other things like multi_select for example.
Unfortunately, I could not connect to the AxKit CVS ("Connection
refused") and so I had to diff my old local CVS copy of PerForm.pm
against PerForm.pm 1.83.

| he can when he can, I am not pointing my finger to anybody. I'd just
| would like to know if anybody actually can look into the issue or if
| PerForm is sort of an unmantained piece of software...
Someone looking into the issue and a "sort of unmaintained piece of
software" does not seem to be mutually exclusive ;-)
Is PerForm being unmaintained? Good question. As discussed in #axkit
some time ago: Maybe you have a look at some alternatives to it.

- --michael

- --
063A F25E B064 A98F A479  1690 78CD D023 5E2A 6688
http://zis.uibk.ac.at/.m/uibk.ac.at_pgp_pubkey.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFCrwVyeM3QI14qZogRAi5hAJ9aylEIFuttSxy/+sEnJKHzv3gN4gCfRpCi
Ff+f2nsWKLQzsSHW8lGiHt4=
=3yzO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to