Hi Matt,

great to here that you finally got started with it. I currently have no
time but hopefully soon to look at it. Together with the new callback
mechanism of XML::LibXML/XML::LibXSLT this offers many interesting
things for the future.

Tom

Matt Sergeant schrieb:
> Well every once in a while someone still asks about AxKit 2. I know this
> project has mostly floundered and people have gone on to other things,
> but I still find some value in the XML paradigm for web development -
> specifically in saving me from worrying about XSS errors, but also it
> looks really useful for AJAX stuff.
> 
> Anyway... Where is AxKit 2.0?
> 
> Well it's coming. In the last few days I've thrown together a few bits
> of code that are the framework for AxKit 2.0.
> 
> First things first: AxKit 2.0 is nothing like AxKit 1. It doesn't even
> remotely resemble it. That's both a bad thing and a good thing. I'll
> explain why.
> 
> But first, what does it look like? Well I spent a long time thinking
> about what it meant to be AxKit, and I also spent a long time thinking
> about how could I make it easier to use and install in these days of
> quick setup frameworks like Ruby on Rails. Sadly mod_perl is not quick
> to setup. Neither is Apache. These are large complicated frameworks with
> lots of features I don't need on my application server. Instead, AxKit2
> has its own httpd. You can read a bit about it here:
> http://use.perl.org/~Matts/journal/30438
> 
> Having our own httpd means that development and deployment is much
> easier. Plus it frees us of the ties of Apache upgrade cycles and
> mod_perl changes. I did not want to be stuck for an "AxKit3" when Apache
> 3.x comes out!
> 
> So I wrote a simple pluggable scalable httpd. It's all pure perl, so no
> nasty compilation required (except obviously you still have to compile
> XML::LibXML etc). Plugins can trivially add configuration directives,
> making development of new subsystems fast and easy.
> 
> And yes it's buggy as all hell right now. But it'll get better I promise.
> 
> Now, on to what the "AxKit" part looks like. Well I decided that I'd had
> enough of special cases and extra wrapper code inside the AxKit
> internals - we spend so much effort in there making sure dependencies
> are logged and checked, and caching is done at every step of the way and
> so on. All this actually slows the whole thing down, and makes the code
> really ugly. So it's gone. If you want to cache from now on it will be DIY.
> 
> And all that config directives stuff to setup pipelines - that got
> really ugly if you wanted alternate pipelines. So that's all gone too.
> Instead AxKit becomes an API for setting up the transformation
> pipelines, and a bunch of utility modules for helping that out. Everyone
> can write perl, and if you can't the examples will be simple enough, or
> someone will write a plugin to set all this up via config directives.
> 
> So let's do a quick example. Say you want to do XSP -> XSLT -> XSLT ->
> HTML. Here's what the code you'll write will look like:
> 
> sub hook_response {
>     my $self = shift;
>     my $file = $self->{headers_in}->filename;
> 
>     # setup the processor
>     my $proc = AxKit2::Processor->new($file);
> 
>     my $s1 = "/path/to/xslt1.xsl";
>     my $s2 = "/path/to/xslt2.xsl";
> 
>     # run the transform ($out is an AxKit2::Processor also)
>     my $out = $proc->transform(
>         XSP => XSLT($s1) => XSLT($s2)
>     );
>     $out->output($self->client);
>     return OK;
> }
> 
> (Note: I haven't got XSP working yet - but it shouldn't be too hard,
> touch wood!)
> 
> So now where is this groovy code? Well it's in axkit.org svn for now,
> but at some point I'll get the apache guys to setup a new repository for
> us on there. Meanwhile follow the progress and have a play around at
> svn://axkit.org/axkit2
> 
> Matt.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to