On 19-Sep-06, at 2:46 PM, Anthony Gardner wrote:
Without the html stuff, the template looks like ........
<xsl:template match='/config'>
...... html type stuff
<xsl:apply-templates select='languages' />
... html type stuff
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match='languages'>
<xsl:apply-templates select='lang' />
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match='lang'>
<xsl:value-of select="@some_attr" />
<xsl:value-of select="@some_attr" />
<xsl:value-of select="@some_attr" />
</xsl:template>
No, the bottle neck will not be to do with this .... I was just
surprised at the time, that's all.
What with technologies such as ORM, Templating, AxKit and any
others that help define MVC (for example) I can;t help think that
at each stage there's always a little bit more overhead.
Absolutely. This is why I say there are three ways to make a web app
scale: Cache, cache, and cache.
It also matters what version of libxslt you're running - there have
been lots of optimisations over the years.
Matt.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]