Jörg, > > http://domain.dom:8000/foo/?fire=hot > > > > Is the above a valid url? the / before the ? looks wrong. > > It's a perfectly valid URL. If you don't want to upgrade, that's the easiest > way to go.
Oh I don't mind upgrading. The problem I have with the dodgy looking url is that it would break my app if the user edited it. Which I don't want. > > What I've done to get round my problem is to have a > > fixup hook. If the request is a POST, I save the params to cache. > > If it's a get and we aren't about to redirect, i save the params to the > > client param api. > > Is this a valid way to do it? (the best way?) > > I strongly suggest to upgrade, or if you don't want to, to use URLs ending > with "/" where needed. Both variants are much better than a caching solution. Ok, I'll dig out the svn stuff and d/l it now. Thank you for your time. John --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
