On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 13:39 +0100, Neil Jagdish Patel wrote: > For any branch you merge-propose into lp:unity/4.0, please make sure it > was based on lp:unity/4.0 and not lp:unity, otherwise your merge request > will bring in the rest of lp:unity, which is not what we want right now :)
Great post, I just wanted to underline this, bold it, and highlight it.
If you think that it *might* be an SRU start from the older branch.
It's *way* easier to go forward than backwards.
Also, I want to say, this applies to the indicators as well :-)
--Ted
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
