I don't think (b) is a good idea for the following reasons : * When the user shuts the PC down, he doesn't expect to give it attention anymore. An update can fail or be interrupted for some reasons (package missing on a server, internet connectivity broken, kernel upgrade asks if the menu.lst should be changed, etc). How do we let the user control the update process in these cases ? How do we make sure the user's attention isn't needed ? * What about laptops ? Sometimes you shutdown your laptop because you're about to move. Do you want, in this case, to have to wait for the upgrade to perform ?
I'm not against the idea itself, but I think it should be an optional thing, not enabled by default. SD. PS : forgot to forward to Ayatana ML again x.x
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
