On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 22:27, Nicholas Ipsen(Sephiroth_VII) < [email protected]> wrote:
> Including Brasero's progress would make it too broad, we need to keep > it oriented towards purely file transfers, and though some might argue > that writing to a cd is also a file transfer, I don't think most > people look at it that way. > i disagree! i always want to know how much percent are done etc. to have a manager that would show me that would be great. this applies to video rendering, audiofile-import, audio rendering, image, video and audio conversion, practially everything that takes time to finish. downloads may be seperated or aggregated in a single list item in such a listing, but i wouldn't omit the other processes because of the special nature of filetransfers and downloads related to how a desktop user thinks. but then again, Zeitgeist & Activity Journal will kick off a brandnew talk about all that, once we all start using or testing them > > Also, the way Brasero currently handles this is awesome. > > i agree, brasero is a dream-come-true from my user POV
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
