I'm going to guess it's because Lotus Symphony's license is proprietary, not FOSS
From: [email protected] Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 23:11:31 +0700 To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Ayatana] OpenOffice bugs as paper cuts Hi All, I've cough by the title. I just wanna ask why IBM Lotus Symphony doesn't be considered to integrate by default to Ubuntu ? I'm currently using and it looks nice for the interface. It may lack some features in spreadsheet, such as URL data import, but I've found it way better than OOffice. Especially, the right handed tools, interface and icons. On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Vishnoo <[email protected]> wrote: On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 14:34 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > Is it still worth accepting OOo bugs as paper cuts given the lame duck > status of the suite at this stage? Most(maybe even all?) of the present remaining OOo papercuts were carried over from last cycle. Desktop team mentioned that whether we stick with OOo or switch to LibO for Natty is still not finalized. It depends on how fast LibO development progresses and how far it is ready before our feature freeze. So for now, since OOo is still in the default Natty install , it's not harmful to get a few of its bugs fixed. ;) -- Cheers, Vish _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
