So does number 5 mean one cannot be a priest and be a sponsor?  

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 10, 2016, at 6:37 AM, Joanne Mercier <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Ok, looking at what George has supplied us in another post here is what the 
> Code of Canon Law 1917 stated on the subject of Sponsors for Baptism and 
> Confirmation:
> 
> BAPTISM
> 609. In order that one may licitly act as sponsor, he must: 
> 1. be fourteen years of age, unless for a just reason the minister admits 
> younger ones; 
> 2. he must not be under excommunication for a notorious crime, nor excluded 
> from legal actions, nor suffer from infamy of law, even though no sentence 
> was pronounced against him in the ecclesiastical court, nor must he be under 
> an interdict, or otherwise a public criminal, or disgraced by infamy of fact; 
> 3. he must know the rudiments of the faith; 
> 4. he must not be a novice or professed member in any religious organization, 
> unless there is no other to act as sponsor and permission is granted by at 
> least the local superior; 
> 5. he must not be in sacred orders, unless he has the express permission of 
> his own Ordinary to act as sponsor. (Canon 766.) 
> 
> 610. In doubtful cases as to whether one can validly or licitly be admitted 
> as sponsor, the pastor should, if time permits, consult the Ordinary. (Canon 
> 767.) 
> 
> 
> CONFIRMATION
> CHAPTER IV. The Sponsors. 
> 636. By a most ancient custom the Church requires a sponsor at Confirmation, 
> if one can be had. (Canon 793.) 
> 
> 637. The sponsor should not stand for more than two, except the minister for 
> a just reason allow him to stand for more. No candidate for Confirmation 
> should have more than one sponsor. (Canon 794.) 
> 
> 638. In order that one may validly act as sponsor, he must: 
> 1. be confirmed himself, have the use of reason and the intention to act as 
> sponsor; 
> 2. not belong to an heretical or schismatic sect, nor be under any of the 
> penalties spoken of in Canon 765, n. 2, by a declaratory or condemnatory 
> sentence; 
> 3. not be the father, mother of, or married to, the one confirmed; 
> 4. be designated by the one to be confirmed, or by his parents, guardians, or 
> in their default or refusal to designate a sponsor, the minister or the 
> pastor may designate him. 
> 5. physically touch either in person or through a proxy the one confirmed in 
> the very act of Confirmation. (Canon 795.) 
> 
> 639. The requirements for licit sponsorship are: 
> 1. he should not be the sponsor of Baptism, unless there is a good reason 
> which is left to the judgment of the minister of Confirmation, or unless 
> Confirmation is given immediately after Baptism; 
> 2. he should be of the same sex as the one confirmed, unless the minister 
> allows an exception in particular cases and for good reasons; 
> 3. he must have the other requisites mentioned for Baptism in Canon 766. ( 
> Canon 796. ) 
> 
> Up until the 1917 code the church had collections of law that were changed 
> and added to by every Pope. The first set-in-soft-cement set of rules was the 
> 1917 code, which was then revised in 1983. Roman law is more flexible than 
> English/American law so it is always open to interpretation and that's why it 
> can vary from diocese to diocese and even from priest to priest. 
> 
> I hope this helps — and thanks George for finding the document I was looking 
> for!
> 
> Joanne Grota Mercier
> 
>> On Feb 9, 2016, at 2:53 PM, George Medeiros <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> The Roman Catholic  Church has hundreds of Canon laws and Canon lawyers. 
>> Like the secular legal system not all laws are understood clearly and when 
>> there are questions about what one can and can not do within the legal 
>> system one contacts a lawyer. When in question, if I understand it 
>> correctly, most clerics are not  church lawyers and they would pose their 
>> questions to the Bishop's Office and  Canon lawyers may or may not be 
>> consulted. 
>> 
>> The question about Canon law in 1600's is a good one and we do have to be 
>> careful about applying today's standards to a earlier time. Just in the last 
>> 50 years the Catholic Church has made many changes, like for example 
>> allowing annulments in marriage,and just look at what Pope Francis is trying 
>> to get the Cardinals and Bishops to look at in regards to contemporary 
>> social issues like divorce and remarriage. Some issues are left to the  
>> judgement of the local pastor who has the job of listening to each person's 
>> individual situation. Thus I am sure those of us from a catholic background 
>> have seen different decisions made in regards to similar situations. George
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>>> On Feb 9, 2016, at 10:44 AM, "\"E\" Sharp" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I don't know about Canon law, etc. but 15 years ago when my last grandson 
>>> was born his parents wanted his older brother 12 and sister 14 to be the 
>>> godparents and the priest at the church gave them a emphatic "no."  They 
>>> had to be at least 16.
>>> 
>>> "E"
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> For options, such as changing to List, Digest, Abridged, or No Mail 
>>> (vacation) mode, log into your Google account and visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Azores. Click in the blue area on the right 
>>> that says "Join this group" and it will take you to "Edit my membership."
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "Azores Genealogy" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>> email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/azores.
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> For options, such as changing to List, Digest, Abridged, or No Mail 
>> (vacation) mode, log into your Google account and visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/Azores. Click in the blue area on the right 
>> that says "Join this group" and it will take you to "Edit my membership."
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Azores Genealogy" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/azores.
> 
> -- 
> For options, such as changing to List, Digest, Abridged, or No Mail 
> (vacation) mode, log into your Google account and visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/Azores. Click in the blue area on the right 
> that says "Join this group" and it will take you to "Edit my membership."
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Azores Genealogy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/azores.

-- 
For options, such as changing to List, Digest, Abridged, or No Mail (vacation) 
mode, log into your Google account and visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Azores.  Click in the blue area on the right 
that says "Join this group" and it will take you to "Edit my membership."
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Azores Genealogy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/azores.

Reply via email to