Karl
I have never understood what this has to do with reality. We all make
decisions based on the weight of evidence, on probability - in fact, on
many things that don't involve the ability to observe. Why should we
restrict evidence for Hebrew at any stage to what can be observed?
When you consider that most of us here are believers of some sort, and
that so much of religion is built on what cannot be observed, it just
seem strange to keep coming back to this.
Kevin Riley
On 3/08/2010 2:26 AM, K Randolph wrote:
I was trained in science classes to disregard any claims based on that which
is not observable. Neither ProtoSemitic nor ProtoHebrew have been observed,
but are built up based on models that may or may not be correct.
Karl W. Randolph.
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
