Doug, There is no evidence that even encourages us to "accept that the language of Adam was Hebrew"; the second half of your question is therefore equally baseless.
Peace. Fred On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Doug Belot <[email protected]> wrote: > If we accept that the language of Adam was Hebrew , would that not mean > that all languages would have a base of hebrew > > doug belot > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Kimball" < > [email protected]> > To: "b-hebrew" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2010 3:11 AM > > Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] cognate alphabet > > > >> Is Greek usually considered a cognate language of Hebrew? >> >> Chris Kimball >> West Redding, CT >> USA >> _______________________________________________ >> b-hebrew mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew >> > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 9.0.869 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3275 - Release Date: 11/24/10 > 05:34:00 > > > _______________________________________________ > b-hebrew mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew > -- --)--------------- "We are not yet what we already are" (J. Pieper). Frederic Clarke Putnam, Ph.D. | Professor of Biblical Studies Philadelphia Biblical University | 200 Manor Avenue | Langhorne, PA 19047-2990 http://pbu.edu | 1215-702-4502 | Fax: 1-215-702-4533 | www.fredputnam.org Before printing this email, think green! _______________________________________________ b-hebrew mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
