dear isaak, how did you know i have one?
i am not at all against ANY word association. i do it all the time. but it is much easier to claim various word connections than to prove that the connection is not a mere a posteriori exercice. for example, i could claim that words of the form XL* come from XAL=state,happen (in both hebrew and arabic). this would include XLD and would not have any relation to being solid. and words which contain GL come from GAL=wave,round. if so, GL$ and XLD would have little to do with one another. nir cohen On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:08:19 -0500, Isaac Fried wrote > 1. I am afraid that the biblical QERAX קרח is not what > you think it is. See Ps. 147:17 > 2. Do you think there is ANY relationship between KERAX and KARAXAT > קרחת ? > > Isaac Fried, Boston University > > >most of our daily > > experience is with encrusted and/or solid objects. most of them, like EC, > > EVEN, QIR, CUQ, QERAX, E$ET -- Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org) _______________________________________________ b-hebrew mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
