dear pere, i guess there is none. BYCH=egg is the closest i could get.
i reiterate that in principle the niqud you suggest is not compatible with xoq hahavarot. (though no rule rules out the exceptions to the rule...) this goes back to a previous issue which i raised some time ago, that the niqud of nouns and verbs follows two different sets of rules. though i dont have exact details, i am pretty sure this statement is correct. if i remember correctly, a non-stressed closed syllable should have a niqud "lene", for nouns (excluding cere); whereas for verbs this depends on the declension. help from the listers will be appreciated. nir cohen >>> De: Pere Porta <[email protected]> Para: [email protected] Data: Fri, 27 May 2011 16:23:46 +0200 Assunto: Re: [b-hebrew] sere versus segol B-hebrew listers, I remark that pattern consisting of three root letters + H so that the first root letter has sere, the second has shewa and the third has qamats is that of the Pi'el Past, third person singular feminine, of some verbs, as in Lm 1:17 ------- P"R&FH, she spread out Ex 23:28 ----- WG"R$FH, (and) she drove out while the same thing with only the difference of segol in the place of sere... these are feminine nouns having consonant het for their first root consonant, as in Gn 34:14 -------- XERPFH, reproach Hos 13:15 ------ XEMDFH, desire My question is: are there in biblical Hebrew any NOUNS fitting the pattern of the Piel form shown in the first part of this post (namely sere in the first root consonant)? I think there is none....... but maybe I'm missing some. Pere Porta (Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain) _______________________________________________ b-hebrew mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
