The key is in Abraham's response in verse 22 where he repeats what Melchizedek says with the pronounced addition of the tetragrammaton. Abraham (or the author) is playing off of the inherit ambiguity in the term El. If Melchizedek is a priest of YHWH, El Elyon, there is no need for Abraham's addition. How on earth would Melchizedek be a worshiper of YHWH? What we have here is the Old Testament's version of Paul's Mars Hill speech. Abraham is saying, "Melchizedek, that God Most High you've been worshipping is, in reality, YHWH, God Most High." this is consistent with the way the character Abraham is portrayed. He has been going around to all these pagan shrines and building altars near them to YHWH who happens to proclaim himself to be the God of whatever attribute the local Canaanite god is over. At the oaks of Mamre and Moreh (asters shrines, fertility cult places) YHWH promises Abram a son, and at Bethel (locus of a shrine to El, creator deity and owner of the land) YHWH promises him the land! Abraham is preaching to the Canaanite without opening his mouth. With the Melchizedek incident, he teaches his friend, the king of Sodom, that YHWH is God most high. In Psalm 110, in my opinion, that dynamic is at play. Why does Abraham legitimize this pagan priest by tithing to him? Answer: he's not so pagan. His heart is after God (el) and Abraham has been sent to teach him the identity of that Most High God.
Sent from my iPad (Because ORU bought me one) Donald R. Vance [email protected] [email protected] On Aug 10, 2011, at 10:41 AM, "Bryant J. Williams III" <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Donald, > > It is clear from the context that "leEl-elyon" is referring to the "the Most > High God" or "God Most High" in connection to Melchi-zedek, King of Salem and > Priest of God Most High. Abram had no problem offering tithes to him in > worship. > So, was Abram paying homage to a "pagan" deity or was he offering homage to > God > Most High? Did Abram believe that he was paying tithes to God (el) or to a > pagan > deity named el)? BTW, I am not bringing Hebrews into the discussion since that > would be OFF-LIMITS. > > Rev. Bryant J. Williams III > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Donald Vance" <[email protected]> > To: "George Athas" <[email protected]> > Cc: "B-Hebrew" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 11:40 PM > Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] El = God? > > >> Darn tootin' it's debated. I don't see how Gen 14:18 can be anything but a > reference to the Canaanite deity. >> >> Sent from my iPad >> Donald R. Vance >> [email protected] >> [email protected] >> >> On Aug 9, 2011, at 8:05 AM, George Athas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Karl is correct, that the word אל is a common noun for 'deity'. However, it > is often used practically as a Proper Name for the president or father of the > gods in the Canaanite pantheon. This is confirmed in Ugaritic, for example. > However, in Hebrew, it is very rarely used that way, if ever (it's > occasionally > debated, though). >>> >>> >>> GEORGE ATHAS >>> Director of Postgraduate Studies, >>> Moore Theological College (moore.edu.au) >>> Sydney, Australia >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> b-hebrew mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew >> _______________________________________________ >> b-hebrew mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew >> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/696 - Release Date: 02/21/2007 > 3:19 > PM > _______________________________________________ b-hebrew mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
