I just want to add that I consider the bestowing upon the dagesh the role of MA-DGIY$, 'emphasizer', a terminological farce.
Isaac Fried, Boston University On May 14, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Isaac Fried wrote: > 9. The reasonable (I am not the only one thinking so) assumption that > the dagesh preceded the niqud explains EVERY facet of the enigma of > the dagesh neatly, completely, and logically. > > Isaac Fried, Boston University _______________________________________________ b-hebrew mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
