Rolf,

The two elements that make up the construct phrase רקיע השׁמים are two 
independent nouns. That they are in construct does not mean they are to be 
equated any more than the expression בית יהוה equates a house with YHWH. The 
two independent nouns have two distinct semantic values within distinct 
semantic domains.

The real question I think you're asking is what is the nature of the construct 
here. How exactly does רקיע relate to שׁמים? Are they being equated in a way 
that we have an appositional construct? Well, in the case of Gen 1, yes I think 
there is an appositional construct. The רקיע is obviously closely related to 
the שׁמים such that the רקיע is seen as that which divides waters above from 
waters below and which is given the name שׁמים in Gen 1.6–8. The רקיע is that 
which the birds fly across the surface of in Gen 1.20. If the רקיע referred 
purely to the space between the waters above and the waters below — what we 
could call the sky/atmosphere — there would be no need to talk about its 
surface. And yet, just as the תהום has a surface such that darkness and the 
wind/spirit can hover across it (Gen 1.2), so the birds fly across the surface 
of the רקיע.

The רקיע is evidently a surface that can be touched, just like the תהום.


GEORGE ATHAS
Dean of Research,
Moore Theological College (moore.edu.au)
Sydney, Australia


_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

Reply via email to