"Wild" is an apt description for some of these discussions. Nonetheless, wild or not, as long as the discussion is about terms found in the text of the Hebrew Bible, their usages and definitions, and the possible implications of those definitions for our understanding of the text, it may well fall within the boundaries of the B-Hebrew guidelines.
It's unavoidable that some of these Hebrew terms evoke "theological ideas" in the minds of readers. Just my two cents. Gary Hedrick San Antonio, TX USA On Sep 20, 2012, at 11:26 AM, Uri Hurwitz wrote: > > As it is, this list is full of wild speculation, conjectures, assumptions > all of which are fine, though often groundless. But aren't we directly > approaching below a subject that appears beyond its stated fields of > discussion? > > Uri Hurwitz > > > [b-hebrew] ] A VISUAL EXPRESSION OF A THEOLOGICAL IDEA OF THESKY/HEAVEN ( > Rolf's Response 5) > Philip Hardy technologist1 at gmx.us > Thu Sep 20 08:33:08 EDT 2012 > > ] > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Hello List. > Below is a set of communication between Ishnian, Rolf, and George wherein we > find "There is one exception, though. The creation by God is a metaphysical > proposition, and metaphysics is a priori excluded in a scientific > explanation. If theologicans follow this stirct scientific principle, the > creation must be viewed as mythological before we start examining it." The > creation by "God" need not be thought of as "mythological" if the word "God" > is defined as "The source of all forces powers and strengths" The word god > can also mean an individual power (ELOAH, ELAH, EL, etc.) or a group of > powers (ELOHIM, ELIM, etc) or the ONE force source of all powers (ELOHIM) or > the one power(EL, ELAH etc...) Philip Hardy
_______________________________________________ b-hebrew mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
