Cory: On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Cory Taylor <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Karl, > > In your exchange with George regarding the name of Jerusalem, you said: > > Since that time I have learned of archaeological evidence that points to a >> 13th dynasty pharaoh, in other words pre-Hyksos, as the pharaoh of the >> Exodus. The destruction of Jerico occurred shortly after that. The evidence >> from archaeology indicates that the orthodox historical model needs to be >> adjusted by centuries. > > > > Unfortunately, I’m away from my main cache of information and won’t return there for some time. So to try to answer your question in a timely manner, I googled “pharaoh of the exodus 13th dynasty” and found several references. One, http://www.ldolphin.org/montgochron.html , seems to be fairly well documented. There are others as well of varying qualities. But the final statement of http://www.ensignmessage.com/archives/exodusscptcs.html sums up the archaeological evidence. The article that first showed me evidence, written by an archaeologist, I didn’t find this time around. As per the late date of Ugarit, this article http://www.ldolphin.org/19thdynasty.html puts Raamses II at a late date, therefore Ugarit, which is dated by artifacts connected with Raamses II, is of the same date. > > Thank you, > > Cory Taylor > Ph.D. Student > University of Iowa > Iowa City, Iowa, USA > Sorry I was not more of a help. Karl W. Randolph.
_______________________________________________ b-hebrew mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
