Each of Genesis 14: 13 and Genesis 15: 16 refers to “the  Amorite”, using 
the same five Hebrew letters:  H-)MRY.  But the first named Amorite, namely  
Mamre the Amorite, is in covenant relationship with Abram, and is Abram’s  
invaluable ally.  That is not the  Amorite who commits a terrible iniquity 
against the early Hebrews.  According to Biblical testimony, who was  Mamre 
the Amorite’s successor?  Was  he another Amorite, and was he “iniquitous” 
in his dealings with the early  Hebrews?  Was he the firstborn son  of Mamre 
the Amorite, whom Mamre the Amorite unduly favored, just as (i) Abraham  
initially unduly favored firstborn son Ishmael [Genesis 17: 16, 18], Isaac  
initially unduly favored firstborn son Esau [Genesis 25: 28], and Jacob  
initially unduly favored the firstborn son of his favorite wife Rachel, namely  
Joseph [Genesis 37: 3]?  Was Mamre’s  successor an Amorite princeling ruler 
who was iniquitous, from the standpoint of  the early Hebrews?   W-h-o  was 
the iniquitous Amorite referred to  at Genesis 15: 16, and  w-h-a-t  was the 
precise nature of that Amorite’s  iniquity regarding the early Hebrews? 
Here’s what scholar Gerhard von Rad says at p. 187 of  “Genesis” (1972):  “
The ‘iniquity of  the Amorites’ is here to be understood as their sexual 
corruption….” 
The mainstream scholarly view of Genesis 15: 16 appears  to be that of 
Gordon J. Wenham, who in “Genesis 1-15” (1987) at p. 332  says:  “Here the 
Amorites stand for  all the inhabitants of Canaan.” 
But if the Biblical phrase “the Amorite”/H-)MRY meant  “all the 
inhabitants of Canaan”, then everyone in Canaan except the Hebrews has been 
divinely 
judged by YHWH  to be iniquitous.  Is that a  sensible interpretation of this 
text?  Abram has just been in an invaluable covenant relationship with 
Mamre the  Amorite.  That Amorite, who was a  west Semitic-speaking inhabitant 
of Canaan,  wasn’t iniquitous.  As to Abimelek  of GRR, who is another west 
Semitic-speaking inhabitant of Canaan, Genesis 20: 4 does not say that he’s 
iniquitous,  but rather says that Abimelek is “a righteous nation”.  Is it 
credible to think that the  Patriarchal narratives are characterizing  a-l-l  
the inhabitants of  Canaan as being iniquitous?  To me, that blatantly 
contradicts what  the text of the last 40 chapters of Genesis explicitly says, 
which features  Abram being in a valuable covenant relationship with each of 
Mamre the Amorite  and Abimelek, two non-Hebrew west Semitic-speaking 
inhabitants of Canaan who are  not iniquitous.   
Moreover, since there were only a tiny number of Amorites  in Canaan, with 
the overwhelming majority of the population of Canaan being  Canaanites and 
Hurrians [based on the Biblical names in the last 40 chapters of  Genesis, 
which accurately reflect a certain time period in Late Bronze Age  Canaan], 
why do scholars ask us to believe that a reference to one tiny minority  
group in Canaan, the Amorites, means “all the inhabitants in Canaan”?   
N-o-t-h-i-n-g  in the Patriarchal narratives supports  that scholarly gambit. 
It seems to me that Biblical scholars have no idea  whatsoever what “the 
iniquity of the Amorite” is.  In particular, isn’t it clear that  Biblical 
scholars are clueless as to who “the Amorite” at Genesis 15: 16  is?  The 
Patriarchal narratives  don’t hate “all the inhabitants of Canaan”!!!  There’
s nothing in the text of the last 40 chapters of Genesis to support  that 
hateful scholarly view, which seeks to brand “all the inhabitants of  Canaan” 
as allegedly being divinely deemed by  YHWH to be “iniquitous”.  No  way!  
Not.  On this thread, let’s come to our senses  and follow the Biblical 
clues in order to figure out who the iniquitous Amorite  was, and what that 
iniquitous Amorite did to the early Hebrews that was so  unforgivably 
iniquitous.  In my  considered opinion, Genesis 15: 16 is talking about one 
historical, iniquitous  Amorite princeling ruler who terribly adversely 
affected the 
first Hebrews, and  is not raining down a horrible divine judgment on “all 
the inhabitants of  Canaan”. 
Jim Stinehart 
Evanston, Illinois 
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

Reply via email to