Oh yes, I know of the interpretation (and even once held to it myself), but the rationale for it seems to be working with assumptions that are not actually expressed in the text.
GEORGE ATHAS Dean of Research, Moore Theological College (moore.edu.au) Sydney, Australia From: K Randolph <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Saturday, 20 October 2012 6:12 AM To: George Athas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: B-Hebrew <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Daniel 9:2127 George: On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:43 AM, George Athas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: … Just to continue the conversation, though, could you let me know why you think the 69-week period is divided into a 7-week and 62-weeks period? I know the answer to this even though I disagree with it: it is believed that the 7 sevens and 62 sevens mentioned in Daniel 9 are consecutive, yet real intervals. I thought you had already heard of this interpretation of the passage. Karl W. Randolph.
_______________________________________________ b-hebrew mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
