1. Indeed, without reason there is no evidence.
2. I fully agree with you that "Reason works in math, not linguistics."
3. What you call "The evidence" is pure fiction.
Isaac Fried, Boston University
On Dec 17, 2012, at 7:07 PM, K Randolph wrote:
Isaac:
Reason is not evidence.
Reason works in math, not linguistics.
The evidence indicates that King David would be hard pressed to
understand a single sentence in spoken modern Hebrew.
Karl W. Randolph.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 1:24 PM, Isaac Fried <[email protected]> wrote:
It totally stands to reason that king David spoke modern Hebrew (No
WAYIQTOLs) to wives and children.
Isaac Fried, Boston University
On Dec 17, 2012, at 4:10 PM, K Randolph wrote:
Isaac:
Just because Biblical Hebrew is a different language than the
modern Hebrew that you speak doesn’t mean that it was never
spoken. Since you’re making the claim, where’s your evidence that
it never was spoken?
Karl W. Randolph.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Isaac Fried <[email protected]> wrote:
We are still waiting for your evidence that biblical Hebrew was
ever spoken.
---IF
On Dec 17, 2012, at 3:26 PM, K Randolph wrote:
to interview a native speaker during Biblical times, would we
have found such an overwhelming use of Wayyiqtols in historical
narrative
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
