1 of 2 
Rob Acosta: 
I have decided to respond to  your post on-list, because several of your 
assertions bear directly on the  meaning of the following key Biblical words 
in the Patriarchal narratives:  “Chief Baker”;  XRY;  )LN.  In this first 
post I will relate what  you say to the Bible’s references to the first two 
above words.  Then in a second post I will show that  preeminent historians do 
not agree with Campbell’s unsupported claim [which you assert]  that Maya 
allegedly fell into disgrace prior to Year 9. 
You wrote:  “…a new commissioner, Maya is put in  place as commissioner 
with the successor Milikilu of Gezer.  The point is this.  According to E. F. 
Campbell in his book  "the Chronology of the Amarna letters"...from which 
all the details are taken,  ALL of Maya's letters from Gezer were written 
before Year 9 of  Akhenaten.” 
In order for this topic to be  of interest to people on the b-hebrew list, 
we must first ask who Maya is  Biblically.  What’s comparable in  the 
Patriarchal narratives to Maya’s fall into disgrace, though exaggerated for  
storytelling purposes, is obviously Genesis 40: 22, when the “Chief Baker” is  
impaled by Pharaoh.  [Historically,  Maya was only figuratively “impaled” by 
pharaoh Akhenaten, not actually  killed.  Maya later shows up as a  top 
official under both King Tut and Horemhab.]  Who would be the “Chief Baker” in 
 Egypt?  One of the most peculiar features of  Amarna was that, uniquely in 
5,000 years of human history, huge amounts of bread  and other food were 
routinely placed on hundreds of offering stands for  Aten.  The Great Aten 
Temple had at least 791 offering  tables!  
http://www.amarnaproject.com/pages/amarna_the_place/central_city/   Why  would 
such vast quantities of food be 
offered to a sun-god?  One has to wonder if Akhenaten had had  some version 
of the famous dream reported in Genesis that warned of 7  consecutive years 
in which the Nile River would fail to flood, and Akhenaten  hoped to prevent 
that from happening by propitiating his sun-god with  extraordinary amounts 
of food offerings, especially bread.  As to how all this affects Maya, in  
addition to his important military duties one of Maya’s key non-military 
titles  [in his tomb 14 at Amarna] is “Overseer of the House of Pacifying the  
Aten”.  Thus Maya could well be  referenced by the Biblical title “Chief 
Baker”, who was in charge of sacrificing  great quantities of bread and other 
food to Aten in an attempt to accomplish  “Pacifying the Aten”.  Note that 
in  Panhesy’s rock tomb at Amarna we see:  “On the left Akhenaten is 
followed by Nefertiti wearing a Khat  headdress.  Both seem to be offering  
loaves”
.  http://euler.slu.edu/~bart/egyptianhtml/tombs/Tombs%20at%20Amarna.htm  
Outside of  Amarna, the title “Chief Baker” seems virtually impossible for a 
top official of  a great king or pharaoh;  Gesenius  was so baffled by this 
that he ad-libs as to this title:  “a dignity that also exists amongst the  
Moguls”.  We see that the Biblical  title “Chief Baker” fits Amarna 
perfectly, while seeming to be almost impossible  in any other context. 
With historical Maya appearing to correspond  to the Biblical “Chief Baker”
 in chapter 40 of Genesis, the next question to ask  is when the Chief 
Baker [the historical “Overseer of the House of Pacifying the  Aten”, namely 
Maya] is portrayed in Genesis as being disgraced by Pharaoh.  [Then in my next 
post I will confirm  that this is the same Year in which Maya historically 
was disgraced by  Akhenaten.] 
To determine the timing that is portrayed  Biblically, we start with 
Genesis 41: 46 and work our ways backwards.  Genesis 41: 46 tells us that 
Joseph 
is  age 30 shanah when he is named chief vizier by Pharaoh.  Genesis 41: 12 
and 41: 1 tell us that  two years earlier, Joseph was a nar/“boy”.  Mark 
Cohen, the leading expert in the world on cultic calendars in the  ancient Near 
East, says that in the Bronze Age the Israelites had an archaic  
understanding of shanah, by which shanah could be viewed as being “the turn of  
the 
year”, which is a 6-month period.  That archaic meaning of shanah is used in 
setting forth people’s stated  ages in the Patriarchal narratives.  Joseph 
had witnessed 30 “turns of the year”/shanah when he became vizier,  meaning 
that he was un-doubled age 15 years in 12-month years.  That is nicely 
confirmed by the fact  that 2 Egyptian years [12-month years] earlier, Joseph 
at 
age 13 years [in  12-month years] was still a mere nar/“boy”.  So Joseph is 
age 13 years when the Chief  Baker is disgraced. 
That is the Hebrew author’s way of telling  us that historically, the Chief 
Baker [the historical “Overseer of the House of  Pacifying the Aten”, 
namely Maya] was disgraced by Pharaoh Akhenaten in Year  13. 
Moving now to the historical side for a  moment, if Maya did come under 
disgrace [which per Amarna Letter EA 292 from the  Ayalon Valley does seem 
quite likely, as we will see in my next post], then that  would have occurred 
in 
Year 13.  The  political reason why Year 13 could have engendered what 
Akhenaten viewed as  being “treason” was Egyptian nobles grumbling about 
Akhenaten’s bizarre decision  in mid-Year 12 to cut off all relations with the 
XRY/Hurrian state of  Midtanni/MDYN/Naharim in eastern Syria and his 
father-in-law Tushratta.  [Jacob likewise cuts off all relations  with his 
father-in-law Laban who lived in the XRY/Hurrian state of  
Midtanni/MDYN/Naharim in 
eastern Syria 12.7 tenfold years after  Abraham’s birth, with the last straw in 
both cases being certain family statues  that were never turned over by the 
early monotheist to his irate  father-in-law.]  This occurred just  when 
such longstanding alliance with the Hurrians/XRY was needed the most to  
counter the threat of the mighty Hittites north of Syria [Genesis 14: 1 has the 
 
authentic Hittite kingly name “Tidal”], who soon thereafter launched the 
deadly  Great Syrian War [which featured four attacking rulers destroying a 
coalition of  five rebellious princelings:  the  “four kings against five” 
referenced at Genesis 14: 9].     
The early Hebrew author of the Patriarchal  narratives knows all of these 
many details that are unique to Amarna in Years  12-14.  In particular, he 
deftly  slips the word XRY into the text regarding the Chief Baker’s dream at 
Genesis  40: 16.  Not knowing Amarna, XRY  there has baffled translators and 
Biblical analysts, who translate XRY as  anything from “white” to “wicker”
 to “bread” to “open-work”, etc., but  n-e-v-e-r  grasp its actual 
historical  meaning:  “Hurrian” [in the phrase  “Hurrian/XRY baskets”;  the 
Hurrians  were world-famous for their fine baskets].  Presumably Akhenaten 
suspected military man Maya [the “Chief Baker”  Biblically] of harboring 
treasonously pro-Hurrian/XRY sentiments after mid-Year  12, and that is why 
Maya, 
the “Overseer of the House of Pacifying the Aten”, was  disgraced in Year 
13, which comes out Biblically as the Chief Baker being  impaled when Joseph 
is un-doubled age 13  years. 
On the b-hebrew list we’re trying to  understand words in the Bible like 
XRY and )LN and “Chief Baker”, but sometimes  words like that in the 
Patriarchal narratives make no sense whatsoever outside  of the context of 
Amarna in 
Years 12-14. 
In my next post I will correct the factual  errors in your post, and show 
that the Amarna Letters are fully consistent with  Maya not being disgraced 
until Year 13. 
Jim  StinehartEvanston,  Illinois
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

Reply via email to