It depends, Chee, on whether the BHQ volume for the book you are doing your research on has been issued yet. But I know some scholars prefer (or preferred) to work from BHK (the edition before BHS) - it had more textual variants, I believe. BHS bought the Dead Sea Scroll readings. Presumably BHQ will have improved on that as more work has been done the DSS. But only a few books have been published yet.
Where are you doing your research? John Leake ---------------------------------- ان صاحب حياة هانئة لا يدونها انما يحياها He who has a comfortable life doesn't write about it - he lives it ---------------------------------- On 11 Jun 2013, at 03:53, chee chen <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > I am recently doing research in MT, and has been informed that BHQ is better > than BHS. Is it time to replace BHS by BHQ as the researched version? will > appreciate if any one here can share me your opinion. Thanks. > > chee chen > _______________________________________________ > b-hebrew mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
_______________________________________________ b-hebrew mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
