Nir Cohen:
1.  You wrote:  “i do not wish to comment on your analysis ofthe name rachel. 
as usual, it is based on suppositions. i do not know ofparents who would give 
their daughter the name pulverize-god or millstone-god.in fact, theoforic 
female names are not that common.”
You make a good point that theophoric names were more commonfor men than for 
women in the ancient world. But this is the Bible, so we might expect many 
Biblical women’s names tohave a theophoric.
RX/mill-stone would normally be thought to have positiveovertones to Rachel’s 
father, Laban [a native west Semitic speaker in easternSyria].  Consider the 
name/title of oneof Pharaoh’s top officials at Genesis 40: 5: )PH [“Baker”].  
Both RX and )PHrelate to the making of bread, which is a necessity of life, and 
which normallyhas positive overtones.  Only later do wefind out that the 
)PH/Baker is impaled by Pharaoh [Genesis 40: 22], and thatRachel doesn’t even 
get the basic honor of being buried at the Patriarchs’Hebron, nor is her heroic 
son Joseph named by Jacob/“Israel” to be the nextleader of the early Hebrews.  
Since RX/mill-stonewould ordinarily have positive overtones, Laban could easily 
have approved ofthe west Semitic/Hebrew meaning of RX-L. [And see the somewhat 
related meaning of Laban’s own name at #4 below.]  Besides, in order for the 
name to also makesense in Hurrian [for the benefit of Rachel’s mother, who 
presumably was not anative west Semitic speaker but rather was a local woman 
from Bronze Ageeastern Syria], one is limited as to what names might be chosen 
for theirnewborn daughter.
2.  You wrote:  “though i recognize that her name mightsomehow have to do with 
the story of laban's teraphim which she stole (arabicRX = gone  ??? compare 
with TERAX'sname).”
Your comment about the name TRX is fascinating.  I see the root of the west 
Semitic/Hebrewmeaning of Terah’s names as indeed being RX, as a shortened form 
of the Hebrewverb )RX.  The Hebrew verb )RX (see forexample Job 34: 8) means 
“to journey, to wander, to take a long caravan trip”.  “You wander” or “you 
will wander” would be T)RX.  For a name, the full-form T)RX could beshortened 
to just TRX, meaning “You wander, journey, take a long caravan trip”. That west 
Semitic meaning perfectly reflectsTerah’s long caravan trip journey from Canaan 
way out east to far-away Ur, andthen only making it back as far as eastern 
Syria on that long caravan tripjourney.  Yet I don’t see how )RX,meaning “to 
wander or take a long caravan trip”, fits Rachel, or would havebeen a name that 
Rachel’s parents would have chosen for her.  [The root of the Hurrian meaning 
of TRX isTRX, not RX [or )RX], so that does not apply to the name “Rachel”.]  
Rather, the more natural west Semitic/Hebrewmeaning of RX in the name RX -L is 
“millstone”, a word which in the ordinary casehas primarily positive overtones, 
though it could turn out to be negative.
3.  You wrote:  “but i tend to assume that the name was therein the first 
place, and the "explaining story" came later.”
But there is no “explaining story” for the name “Rachel”.  Or for the name 
“Leah”.  I begin to fear that you may subscribe to thescholarly theory that the 
author of Genesis 17: 5-6 allegedly had no idea whatthe real meaning of the 
name “Abraham” was, and he allegedly made up a falseetymology and meaning for 
that name centuries after the name “Abraham” hadalready come into the Hebrew 
tradition of the Patriarchal narratives.  But the name “Abraham” is never 
attested inthe ancient world outside of the Bible. The name “Abraham” doesn’t 
exist outside of the naming story at Genesis17: 5-6, which in my opinion tells 
us precisely, and accurately, what the name “Abraham”means.
4.  You wrote:  “same is, perhaps, לבן ("owner of aheart") and the story about 
גנב את לבו.”
If you’re switching now to analyzing the name “Laban”/LBN, I’mafraid I don’t 
follow your reference to “owner of a heart”.  But note the phrase NLBNH LBNYM 
at Genesis11: 3, relating to making bricks to build the Tower of Babel, which 
featuresLBN LBN twice in succession.  One ofLaban’s most famous actions in the 
narrative is that at Genesis 31: 44-46 Labanand Jacob pile up stones, somewhat 
akin to making a mini-Tower of Babel as itwere, as a peaceful border of sorts 
between their two peoples.  If the west Semitic/Hebrew etymology andmeaning of 
the name LBN refers to “white bricks”, then perhaps we should not beso 
surprised that his younger daughter’s name RX -L refers to a “millstone”.  Both 
bricks and millstones are hard objectsthat are usually viewed positively, yet 
in the Tower of Babel story [which longpost-dates the Patriarchal narratives] 
the building of that Tower with bricksturned out to be a negative thing.
5.  You wrote:  “in general i am skeptic about the hiddenassumption you are 
making, that biblical names are necessarily"supposed" to reflect a property of 
their bearers.”
But based on what the text of the Patriarchal narratives  s-a-y-s , look at all 
the personal names Ilisted in my response to Chavoux Luyt that are portrayed 
asclosely relating to the character’s actions in the narrative:  (i) Abraham, 
(ii) Sarah, (iii) Ishmael, (iv)Isaac, (v) Esau, (vi) Jacob [not to mention 
“Israel”, which Chavoux Luytcharacterizes as being a nickname], and (vi) Reuben 
[plus Jacob’s other 11sons].  Why wouldn’t we expect the names “Leah”and 
“Rachel” to be the same?  You arewell aware of Rachel’s sad fate.  Shouldn’twe 
then expect to see a premonition of that in her name?  By contrast, Leah ends 
up, against the odds,winning the grand prize, as her son Judah is named as the 
proper successor toJacob/“Israel”.  Shouldn’t we thereforeexpect the name 
“Leah” to be more positive than the name “Rachel”?  [I see the name “Leah”/L)H 
as being L -)H : L-)X, and as meaning “Belonging to God”, which is a very 
positive meaning.]  That’s the way the above 7 names work.  Why shouldn’t the 
names “Leah” and “Rachel”be expected to work that way as well?
6. You wrote:  “they aresupposed to reflect their parents (mostly, mother's) 
attitude on, or before,birth. suffice it to bring examples: izchak, or moses, 
or the 12 tribes, etcetc.”
As to the name “Isaac”, what the text says is this.  At Genesis 17: 17, Abraham 
[not Sarah] laughsat God’s notion that old Sarah might still be able to bear a 
child.  Then just two verses later, at Genesis 17:19, God tells Abraham that 
Abraham is to call the son that oldSarah will bear “Isaac”.  Thus the name 
“Isaac”is portrayed in the text as first and foremost reflecting the divine 
attitudetoward the father [Abraham], rather than as primarily reflecting the 
mother’sattitude regarding the birth.  Yes, Sarahlaughs at Genesis 18: 12-13 at 
God’s reiteration that old Sarah will yet bear achild, and Sarah laughs with 
delight at Genesis 21: 6 upon Isaac’s actualbirth.  Yet the first “laugh” 
regarding oldSarah bearing a son, which precipitates God dictating that a son 
to be borne bySarah shall be called “Isaac” [which means “he laughs” in 
Hebrew], is Abraham’slaugh, not Sarah’s laugh.  
7. You wrote:  “nor do i seehow isaac ties the name leah to a cow, other than 
the fact that in israelichildren books in the 1950s this would be a fit name 
for a cow.  maybe he read some of those. but even thesebooks are gone now, and 
cows are only discussed as food items.”
Isaac Fried’s later post sees the name “Leah” as meaning “heavy(pregnant?) 
sheep”.  It’s nice to seethat Isaac Fried does not rely on the Assyrian word 
letu for “cow”, since suchAssyrian word bears no resemblance to the name 
“Leah”, or on the Arabic wordfor “bull”, since (i) Laban wouldn’t call a 
newborn daughter a “bull”, forheaven’s sake, and (ii) Arabic isn’t relevant to 
Bronze Age eastern Syria inany event.  But if I understand IsaacFried’s own 
explanation of the name “Leah”, he seems to be trying to tie L)H/“Leah”to (WL, 
meaning a “ewe” or “cow” that is nursing.  But (WL is not at all like L)H as to 
theHebrew letters involved.  [But perhaps Ihave completely misunderstood what 
Isaac Fried is saying there.]
I myself do not think it makes sense to view the westSemitic/Hebrew meanings of 
the names “Leah” and “Rachel” as being “Cow” and “Ewe”.  Certainly the names of 
the last two HebrewMatriarchs have more significance than that!
JimStinehart
Evanston,Illinois

_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

Reply via email to