Robert,

Also regarding Isaiah 44:24...

Normally, I would say that the presence of the pronoun plus the participle 
denotes something like a present progressive. One of the difficulties in this 
verse is that we should treat the same verb forms in the same way in a single 
clause like this.

This creates difficulties. We would end up with 


"Thus says the LORD,
the one (1) REDEEMING you, and the one (2) FORMING you from the womb, "I, the 
LORD, am (3) MAKING all things, (4) STRETCHING out the heavens by Myself And 
(5) SPREADING out
the earth all alone:" (Modified from NASB)
The Old Greek/Septuagint compromises by rendering the first three verbs as 
participles and last two verbs as finite aorists:


οὕτωςλέγεικύριοςὁ1 λυτρούμενόςσεκαὶὁ2 πλάσσωνσεἐκκοιλίαςἐγὼκύριοςὁ3 
συντελῶνπάντα4 ἐξέτεινατὸνοὐρανὸνμόνοςκαὶ5 ἐστερέωσατὴνγῆντίςἕτερος
NASB makes a similar choice:

"Thus says the LORD,
your Redeemer (noun [originally a participial form in English]), and the one 
who formed (finite past-tense, similar to aorist as simple past) you from the 
womb, "I, the LORD, am
the maker (noun [originally a participial form in English]) of all things, 
Stretching (participle, possibly to denote present progressive) out the heavens 
by Myself And spreading (participle, possibly to denote present progressive) out
the earth all alone," 

Here is the Hebrew text (Note that Kethib is in parenthesis, Qere in brackets):
  
  44:24 כֹּֽה־אָמַ֤ר יְהוָה֙ גֹּאֲלֶ֔ךָ וְיֹצֶרְךָ֖ מִבָּ֑טֶן אָנֹכִ֤י יְהוָה֙ 
עֹ֣שֶׂה כֹּ֔ל נֹטֶ֤ה שָׁמַיִ֙ם֙ לְבַדִּ֔י רֹקַ֥ע הָאָ֖רֶץ )מִי) (אִתִּי] 
(מֵאִתִּֽי[׃
 Even if we remove the vocalization to render this a purely consonantal text, 
the presence of אנוכי (corresponding to the pronoun "I") makes it clear that 
these verbs are best read as participles rather than third-person masculine 
singular forms. This is further borne out by the lack of a relative אשׁר 
clause. This may be strictly required, but I believe that if these verbs were 
intended to be third masculine singular instead of participial, we might expect 
the verse to begin more like this:

כה אמר יי אשׁר גאלך

Of course, Hebrew doesn't always do what we expect, and relative clauses abound 
in Biblical Hebrew without an אשׁר in sight. Nevertheless, the absence of a 
relative construction supports seeing these verbs as participles.

I think that the Old Greek/Septuagint translators did a good job of trying to 
render the Hebrew in a way that made sense to their readers. This was almost 
certainly their primary goal, which meant that they could not always follow the 
Hebrew grammar in their translation, even if they wanted to do do. Therefore, 
we should not be quick to read too much into why they might have chosen one 
form over another. 

It would be interesting to see what Aquila and Symmachus do with this verse.

Sincerely,

Chris Lovelace




>________________________________
> From: C L <[email protected]>
>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 10:45 AM
>Subject: Aorist verbs in Septuagint Isaiah
> 
>
>
>Robert,
>
>
>Regarding your questions about aorist verbs in Greek Isaiah 44:24: The aorist 
>forms in Greek are timeless. Often, the aorist is correctly translated as 
>past-tense because it refers aspectually to events that are viewed as complete 
>(or punctiliar, as a snapshot, etc.). The past tense is a tidy way of 
>expressing complete events in English, since the present and future tenses are 
>essentially aspectually incomplete or irrealis.
>
>
>Therefore, it is completely appropriate for a Greek aorist verb to express 
>present tense for a simple, aspectually unmarked event.
>
>
>Dan Wallace discusses this at length, with very helpful examples, in Greek 
>Grammar Beyond the Basics, 554-555. On page 556, he describes the gnomic use 
>of the aorist, which seems to fit the usage you depict in Isaiah 44:24.
>
>The verbs in the Masoretic Text of Isaiah 44:24 are participles: I, Y", am the 
>MAKER (ptcp) of all, STRETCHER [of] the heavens, BEATER (EXTENDER) of the 
>Earth."
>
>Or you could take the participial construction as progressive: "I am the one 
>MAKING/DOING all, STRETCHING the heavens, BEATING OUT the Earth."
>
>I have heard this verse used to defend the notion that Isaiah 44:24 teaches 
>that the cosmos is expanding. One of the problems with that view is that you 
>would also have to explain how the earth is also in the process of being 
>FORGED or BEATEN OUT (like a smith working metal). If the earth is not 
>presently in the process of being FORMED by the Creator, then it seems best to 
>just take this as an adjectival description:
>
>"I am the MAKER of all, the FORGER of the earth, STRETCHER of the
 heavens."
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Chris Lovelace
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

Reply via email to