Hi, > > > Which means, we can now prepare 0.3 for Debian/experimental, or to > > > unstable if you you think that's better. > > > > I think unstable would be fine for the moment or any objections ? > > Then 0.2 would be "gone".. as I understood you, you have these two branches > for a reason... if not, let's go for 0.3~svn_revision in unstable.
yes - 0.3 is not stable yet. I'm not in a hurry. If you think it is better to go with experimental first I wont object to that. Another option would be to delay this question for a month or so. I know that during the CCC event (at the end of the yea)r a lot of testing and hacking is planned. Lets see where we are after that. Greetings, Marek
