On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 03:12:57PM +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote: > Hi all, > > Very nice setup Andrew :)
I cannot take much credit for it. I helped write the project proposal, but then was not allowed to take part in the project because of other higher priority projects. The credit goes to Hochschule Luzern, Linus and others. > In my honest opinion we are mixing two different issues: > 1) current hop penalty value not really significant > 2) OGM link quality measurements do not reflect the metric we'd like it to be Yes, i agree. However, in the scenarios we have seen in this project, they are related. When OGM based TQ giving us too optimistic values, a higher hop penalty makes this even worse. However, comments so far suggest i'm in a corner case, and that for others, a higher hop penalty does help. So for the moment, maybe increasing the hop penalty is the right things to do, but remember that once we have a better TQ measurement, that the hop penalty should be examined again. Andrew
